Does Check decide whether an AI system complies?
No. Check makes a cited first pass from the facts you record. It narrows the candidate paths and flags open questions. A person reviews the result, and legal conclusions remain with qualified counsel.
People affected
Employment context
System provider
High-risk pathway
Annex III / 4Deployer duties
Article 26Provider duties
Role mismatchOne unresolved question remains.
The operating method
Capture intended use, role, owner and operating facts.
Propose relevant paths and set irrelevant duties aside.
Keep the reference text, version and unresolved questions.
Put a named human at the decision point.
Questions buyers ask
No. Check makes a cited first pass from the facts you record. It narrows the candidate paths and flags open questions. A person reviews the result, and legal conclusions remain with qualified counsel.
The first live cartridge is the EU AI Act. Check is built to run more regulatory cartridges, but future coverage is not presented as available today.
Bring one AI system and enough non-confidential facts to describe its intended use, your role, its owner and its stage. Do not put evidence packs, credentials or sensitive system data into the first intake.
You receive a working record of the system facts, cited candidate paths and unresolved questions. It is a starting point for review, not a certificate or legal opinion.
Use qualified counsel when you need legal interpretation, a formal risk position or sign-off. Check makes the engineering record easier to inspect; it does not replace that judgement.